Analysis of Individual Social-ecological Mediators and Moderators and Their Ability to Explain Effect of a Randomized Neighborhood Walking Intervention

Analysis of Individual Social-ecological Mediators and Moderators and Their Ability to Explain Effect of a Randomized Neighborhood Walking Intervention

Blog Article

Abstract Background Using data from the SHAPE trial, a randomized 6-month neighborhood-based intervention designed to increase walking activity among older adults, this study identified and analyzed social-ecological factors carhartt flasche mediating and moderating changes in walking activity.Methods Three potential mediators (social cohesion, walking efficacy, and perception of neighborhood problems) and minutes of brisk walking were assessed at baseline, 3-months, and 6-months.One moderator, neighborhood walkability, was assessed using an administrative GIS database.The mediating effect of change in process variables on change in brisk walking was tested using a product-of-coefficients test, and we evaluated the moderating effect of neighborhood walkability on change in brisk walking by testing the significance of the interaction between walkability and intervention status.

Results Only one of the hypothesized mediators, walking efficacy, explained the intervention effect (product of the grapevine colour saree coefficients (95% CI) = 8.72 (2.53, 15.56).

Contrary to hypotheses, perceived neighborhood problems appeared to suppress the intervention effects (product of the coefficients (95% CI = -2.48, -5.6, -0.22).

Neighborhood walkability did not moderate the intervention effect.Conclusion Walking efficacy may be an important mediator of lay-lead walking interventions for sedentary older adults.Social-ecologic theory-based analyses can support clinical interventions to elucidate the mediators and moderators responsible for producing intervention effects.